Melbourne Indymedia wrote:Melbourne Independent Media CenterBan the Bong?by Freeborn Tuesday December 19, 2006 at 09:18 AM
respect_what_you_use@yahoo.com.au <span class=postbigbold>Push to ban sale of bongs</span>
<span class=postbold>The federal government is pushing for a ban on the sale of marijuana bongs in Australia.</span>
Christopher Pyne, the federal Parliamentary Secretary for Health, said the government believed the legal sale of bongs sent a message that it approved of such drugs.
A message of drug approval....hmmm.
<ol>
<li> 'Ethanol Drug dealers have the right to push their drugs/products' - Mr. Pyne stated. </li>
<li> 'I have consumed a lot of drugs, but I have never been 'drunk'. said Mr. Pyne. </li>
<li> Prof.Margaret Hamilton, "Alcohol is the preferred drug of most Australians. Our culture means that as a community we associate alcohol with almost all Social Political, Sporting, Organisational and Celebratory events.</li>
<li> The Hon. John Della Bosca, "The Government is not concerned with the consumption of alcohol per se, as we acknowledge that alcohol has an important and recognised cultural and social role". </li>
<li> Health Dept. of Australia, "Alcohol is the most widely consumed psychoactive drug in Australia". (Yet, it's still legal?)</li>
<li> The Hon. John Della Bosca, "Researchers found that problem drinkers can learn to control their drinking without having to abstain from alcohol altogether".</li>
</ol>
Now for every coin there is two sides, and from Drug Approval to Drug Apartheid.....The list is as follows........
<ol>
<li> Mr. Abbott, Health Minister said, "The anti-drug advertisements had to hit hard to get the message across to teenagers that illicit drugs kill". (except for Cannabis, of course, which has never taken a single life of its own volition, but there's no news in that. On the other hand, the 'all good' drug racked up 4,300 in just one year, and what did our Government and its dealers say? 'Rack 'em up..let's play again'. The apartheid games must continue).
Mr. Abbott continued, "We want young people to get the message that there is no safe way to use illicit drugs". (Shouldn't that be, Mr. Abbott, that there is no safe way to use ANY drug? Considering that the latest research states that even one drink of ethanol drug a day can cause mouth cancer, and the drug ethanol is a proven multiple cancer causer, never mind the other 60 medical conditions including psychosis and other mental illnesses. </li>
<li> On an NBN News Report, Mr.Pyne -while talking about drugs and psychosis/mental illness- failed to mention three drugs, proven to cause mental illness. a) ethane hydroxide b) tri-methyl-xanthine and c) nicotine. He also failed to mention anything about nutritional deficiencies and mental illness, considering that 'drugs, if you don't eat, they eat you'. (That goes for ALL drugs, all buzzwords aside, including the world's favourite addictive, psychoactive drug sucrose - also called sugar). Why? Simple. His targets were cannabis and Ecstasy.</li>
<li> Considering Mr. Della Bosca stated that Researchers found that problem ethanol drug abusers can learn to respect their drug of choice, without having to abstain from it/declare No Tolerance on it, WHY does the National Cannabis Strategy involve a Forced Choice Policy of Abstinence while the National Ethanol/Ethyl Alcohol Strategy allows all and sundry to be targeted with (advertisements), and to consume freely (as much as they like) their particular drug of choice? 'Smells like team apartheid' (to parody Andrew Johns with his huge Stein in hand parodying Nirvana...'Smells like teams spirit'). </li>
</ol>
Mr Pyne's call to ban bongs comes after a landmark report from former Australia Federal Police commissioner Mick Palmer that found smoking cannabis could contribute to mental illness, News Limited newspapers said.
.....Warning! Warning! No Tolerance Policy declares that Drug Consumption that could/might/may contribute to mental illness must be banned. Bye bye carton, bye bye long neck, bye bye RTD, bye by spirits, bye bye coffee 'fix', bye bye Coca Cola/Pepsi, bye bye new flood of caffeinated energy drinks proudly mixed with ethanol and consumed by 'schoolies', bye bye sucrose, bye bye prescription drugs, bye bye NSAIDS, bye bye OTC drugs, bye bye gambling, bye bye credit cards, bye bye computer/video games, and so on and so forth.
This problem had been identified more particularly in young people. Drugs are supposed to be for 18 years and over, except for Class C drugs. C for Caffeine, C for Cannabis. You may not agree with one of these Class C drugs being given to the youth, so why do you agree with the other one, which is also given to toddlers on a constant basis. Ever heard of Caffeine anaphylaxis/cerebral allergy and Foetal Caffeine syndrome and effects? It really does exist...but no-one tells you about it. We have drug apartheid instead. "Our drugs good, your drugs bad...that's it!"
Bongs are sold at some tobacconists and service stations. They have a small bowl in which marijuana is placed. As well as tobacco, fruit skins, herbs, spices etc.
"I'm certainly concerned about the proliferation of apparatus for the use of illicit substances," Mr Pyne said. What...only illicit substances, Mr. Pyne? How about, instead of having a mind for drug apartheid and discrimination, have a mind for being concerned about the ABUSE of ALL drugs, for ALL human beings and stop just having a mind of No Tolerance and persecution of individual USE and CHOICE. Use is a beneficial action, and no-one has the right to deny another individual something that truly benefits them..whether as medicine or recreation.
Everyone has their medicinal drugs of choice and everyone has their recreational drug/drugs of choice. So, whose right is it to force individual choice of beneficial application or action? Answer: The Individual and the Individual alone. Just because someone says something is bad or wrong does not mean I cannot find something useful, good and respectful to do with it.
The Victorian government banned cocaine kits earlier this year, but ruled out a blanket ban on bongs. A spokeswoman said there were too many ethnic groups that used bongs to smoke tobacco and other legal substances. Cocaine kits banned - a Flood of Ethanol kits/Combos welcomed with open arms! A Flood of Caffeine kits/Combos welcomed with open arms.
"We are happy to continue to work with the other states and federal government in developing greater consistency on the sale of drug paraphernalia as part of this government's drug enforcement and harm minimisation strategy," the spokeswoman said.
(........greater consistency on the sale of drug paraphernalia - so far the consistency has been pretty good. Consistently persecute any form of drug paraphernalia that comes into competition with the paraphernalia of the Drug cartels of ethanol, nicotine and caffeine. Meanwhile, consistently associate these three drugs only with, to quote Prof. Margaret Hamilton, "almost all social, political, sporting, organisational and celebratory events"). Now THAT'S consistency!...even though it makes a mockery of 'the fair go'.
Aside from what anyone tells you, ANY drug lab can be dangerous in an abusers hands. ANY drug can be dangerous in an abusers hands. And ANY drug delivery system can be dangerous in an abusers hands. Abuse is the problem. Respectful USE is the solution.